Influence of hyaluronic acid on intra-articular friction - a biomechanical study in whole animal joints.

BACKGROUND: Cartilage is a mechanically highly stressed tissue in the human body and an important part of synovial joints. The joint cartilage is lubricated by synovial fluid with hyaluronic acid (HA) as main component. However, in joints with osteoarthritis HA has a lower concentration and molecular weight compared to healthy joints. In recent years, the intra-articular injection of therapeutic HA lubricant, has become a popular therapy. The effect of HA application on the friction of a complete joint with physiological movement needs to be further determined. METHODS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the lubrication effect of the joint by three lubricants (NaCl, fetal calf serum (FCS) and HA) and their effect on the friction in nine complete ovine carpo-metacarpal joints. The joints were mounted on a material testing machine and a physiological movement with 10° rotation was simulated with ascending axial load (100 - 400 N). Specimens were tested native, with cartilage damage caused by drying out and relubricated. Dissipated energy (DE) as a measure of friction was recorded and compared. RESULTS: Investigating the effect of axial load, we found significant differences in DE between all axial load steps (p < .001), however, only for the defect cartilage. Furthermore, we could document an increase in DE from native (Mean: 15.0 mJ/cycle, SD: 8.98) to cartilage damage (M: 74.4 mJ/cycle, SD: 79.02) and a decrease after relubrication to 23.6 mJ/cycle (SD: 18.47). Finally, we compared the DE values for NaCl, FCS and HA. The highest values were detected for NaCl (MNorm = 16.4 mJ/cycle, SD: 19.14). HA achieved the lowest value (MNorm = 4.3 mJ/cycle, SD: 4.31), although the gap to FCS (MNorm = 5.1 mJ/cycle, SD: 7.07) was small. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to elucidate three effects in joints with cartilage damage. First, the friction in damaged joints increases significantly compared to native joints. Second, especially in damaged joints, the friction increases significantly more with increased axial load compared to native or relubricated joints. Third, lubricants can achieve an enormous decrease in friction. Comparing different lubricants, our results indicate the highest decrease in friction for HA.

Influence of Cage Design on Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Dorsal Lumbar Spinal Fusions: A Comparison of Lordotic and Non-Lordotic Cages.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparison between lordotic and non-lordotic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages in degenerative lumbar spine surgery and analyze radiological as well as clinical outcome parameters in long-term follow up. METHODS: In a retrospective study design, we compared 37 patients with non-lordotic cage (NL-group) and 40 with a 5° lordotic cage (L-group) implanted mono- or bi-segmental in TLIF-technique from 2013 to 2016 and analyzed radiological parameters of pre- and postoperative (Lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), and pelvic tilt (PT), as well as clinical parameters in a follow-up physical examination using the Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland-Morris Score (RMS), and visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Surgery was mainly performed in lower lumbar spine with a peak in L4/5 (mono-segmental) and L4 to S1 (bi-segmental), long-term follow-up was on average 4 years postoperative. According to the literature, we found significantly better results in radiological outcome in the L-group compared to the NL-group: LL increased 6° in L-group (51° preoperative to 57° postoperative) and decreased 1° in NL-group (50° to 49° (P < 0.001). Regarding SL, we found an increase of 5° in L-group (13° to 18°) and no difference in NL-group (15°)(P < 0.001). In PT, we found a clear benefit with a decrease of 2° in L-group (21° to 19°) and no difference in NL-group (P = 0.008). In direct group comparison, ODI in NL-group was 23% vs 28% in L-group (P = 0.25), RMS in NL-group was 8 points vs 9 points in L-group (P = 0.48), and VAS was in NL-group 2.7 vs 3.2 in L-group (P = 0.27) without significant differences. However, the clinical outcome in multivariate analysis indicated a significant multivariate influence across ODI and RMS of BMI (Wilks λ = 0.57, F [4, 44] = 3.61, P = 0.012) and preoperative SS (Wilks λ = 0.66, F [4, 44] = 2.54, P = 0.048). Age, gender, cage type and postoperative PT had no significant influence (P > 0.05). Intraoperatively, we saw three dura injuries that could be sutured without problems and had no consequences for the patient. In the follow-up, we did not find any material-related problems, such as broken screws or cage loosening, also no pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we think it's not cage design but other influenceable factors such as correct indication and adequate decompression that lead to surgical success and the minimal difference in the LL therefore seemed to be of subordinate importance.

Effect of graft positioning on dissipated energy in knee osteochondral autologous transplantation-A biomechanical study.

Focal cartilage defects can be treated by osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT). High congruence of the graft with the surrounding cartilage structure is essential for a good clinical outcome, but can not always be achieved. We recently established a method to measure dissipated energy (DE) as a friction parameter in knee joints. We now investigated how autograft harvesting and implant positioning affect the DE during knee motion. Six sheep knee joints were cyclically motioned under 400 N axial load. During the cyclic motion, the flexion angle and the respective torque were recorded and the DE was calculated. Several experimental conditions were tested: first, the DE was measured after approach had been performed ("native"). Subsequently, a cylinder was removed from the medial femur condyles and a donor cylinder was inserted from an unloaded site in four different transplant positions: even, 1 mm deeper, 1 mm higher, and flush without cartilage (defect). No significant changes in friction were observed between the native knee and an even or deep OAT positioning. We, however, found a small but significant increase in DE between the "native" and "1 mm high" formations (ΔDE compared with native = 14 mJ/cycle; P = .004 after data normalization) and a large increase in defect situation (ΔDE compared with native = 119 mJ/cycle; P = .001). Considering the long-term therapeutic aim that is pursued when performing OAT, elevated graft positioning should clearly be avoided. From a biomechanical point of view, donor site morbidity after cylinder harvest can be neglected.